Defendant no.1 sought clarification under Section 151 CPC that it had not obtained a copyright license from defendant no.2, contrary to what was recorded in the order dated 15 October 2024. Defendant no.2 stated it would supply its song list only if licensing was pursued. The application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~78
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
PARVEEN KUMAR & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Archana Sachdeva and Mr. Maaz Ali Khan, Advs. for D-2. M: 9818758576 Email: [email protected]
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
%
O R D E R 21.10.2024
I.A. 42832/2024 (Application seeking correction/clarification of order dated 15th October, 2024)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/10/2024 at 12:51:55
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
OCTOBER 21, 2024/kr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/10/2024 at 12:51:55
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 15 October 2024 could be clarified to record that defendant no.1 had not obtained a license from defendant no.2.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parveen Kumar
Defendant no. 2
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
