The High Court recorded a settlement between the plaintiff and defendants under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, declared the suit decreed in terms of the settlement, and directed the refund of court fees.
Suit decreed in terms of settlement; court fees refunded; IA allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED.....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Apoorva Maheshwari and Ms. Brinda Nagaraja, Advocates.
versus
SYNERGIC PHARMA THROUGH MR SUMIR KUMAR PROPRIETOR & ANR. .....Defendants
Through: Mr. Avinash Kumar Jha, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 18.10.2024
I.A. 42516/2024 (O-XXIII Rule 3 of CPC)
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 307/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:43:02
CS(COMM) 307/2024
AMIT BANSAL, J
OCTOBER 18, 2024 /kd
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 307/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:43:02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the settlement arrived between the parties is lawful and should be recorded?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
