The Court recorded terms of a settlement between the parties via an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and decreed the suit accordingly.
Suit decreed against the defendant in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Saumya Bajpai, Advocate
versus
ANSHULA KAPOOR .....Defendant
Through: Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Ms. Srishti Mishra, Mr. Aman Pathak and Mr. Sumeet Mishra, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 05.12.2024
I.A. 47238/2024 ( under Order XXIII Rule 3, CPC )
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 31/2020
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:42:58
CS(COMM) 31/2020
AMIT BANSAL, J
DECEMBER 5, 2024 ds
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 31/2020
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:42:58
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
