Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw CRL.REV.P. and CRL.M.A. Parties had settled disputes per counsel. Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~131
SHIV KUMAR MAURYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S.Chauhan, Adv. through V.C
versus
THE STATE THROUGH SHO & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State. SI Tilak Raj, PS Ranhola.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
OCTOBER 7, 2024 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 16:38:11
Shiv Kumar Maurya
The State Through SHO & ANR
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
