Prosecution filed a revision petition against a 2022 order discharging two respondents and framing charges only against Respondent No. 1. After the Court discharged all accused in CRL.M.C.4655/2024 following settlement and complainant's retraction, this petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~69
THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Nandini Diesh, Advocate.
versus
HARISH VERMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocate for Respondent No.1 to 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 07.10.2024
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
OCTOBER 7, 2024/ ‘Aman’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 13:27:21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition against discharge of respondents and framing of charges remains viable after the underlying FIR disputes were settled and the accused were discharged in a separate procee
The State (GNCT of Delhi)
Harish Verma & Ors.
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
