Disposed

Pappu Pravin Jain v. SHO Ps Karol Bagh & Ors.

Delhi HC23 Sept 2024CRL.M.C./7486/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged validity of criminal notice served to his wife in Mumbai against Standing Orders. Court accepted argument that petitioner claims non-receipt and declared notice invalid for future proceedings, disposing petition with directions.

What did the court decide?

The impugned notice dated 16th September 2024 declared invalid for future proceedings; petition disposed of.

Pappu Pravin Jain Vs SHO Ps Karol Bagh & Ors. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~57

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.M.C. 7486/2024 CRL.M.A. 28568/2024 CRL.M.A. 28569/2024 PAPPU PRAVIN JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashesh Lal, Ms. Rachna Lal, Mr. Raghav Parwatiyar Lal, Advocates.

¶4

versus

¶5

SHO PS KAROL BAGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Suraj Kumar, PS: Karol Bagh.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 23.09.2024

¶8

This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of notice under Section 35(3) BNSS dated 16^th September, 2024 issued to the petitioner with respect to FIR 805/2024 under Sections 318(4)/316(2)/61(2)/3(5) BNS, PS Karol Bagh.

¶9

Petitioner’s contention is that a handwritten notice dated 16^th September, 2024 was served upon the wife of the petitioner at the residence of Mumbai in his absence which is in violation of the directions passed by Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.7608/2017 titled as Amandeep Singh Johar V Government of NCT and Standing Order 109/2020 dated 14^th May, 2009 of Delhi Police.

¶10

At the outset, counsel for APP for State submits on instructions that proper notice complying with the Standing Orders has been sent by mail to the petitioner.

¶11

Counsel for petitioner states on instructions that they have not received the same yet.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:51:17

¶14

In any event, considering these submissions the impugned notice dated 16^th September, 2024 shall be considered as invalid for the purposes of future proceedings.

¶15

The residence address of the petitioner as per the affidavit is House no. 22, Building Bishram Bhawan, Kolbhat Street, Chira Bazar, Mumbai -400002 .

¶16

Petition is disposed of with the above directions.

¶17

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶18

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶19

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024/RK

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:51:17

Pappu Pravin Jain v. SHO Ps Karol Bagh & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Pravin Jain v. SHO Ps Karol Bagh & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gorakh Thakur & Ors. Vs Sate of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Shivam & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mohar Singh Vs Pooja Gupta

Rajvir Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Aman Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Sh Guarav Mittal & Ors. Vs the State of Delhi & Anr.