Quashing petition seeking quashing of FIR under Sections 420/468/471 IPC based on settlement via MoU resolving a property dispute. Court allowed quashing of FIR and proceedings, parties to abide by settlement terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
GORAKH THAKUR & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. S.C. Rana, Adv.
versus
SATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar, PS Jaitpur. Mr. Rajesh Bagga, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 10:43:31
the process of the Court and an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Consequently, the FIR No.303/2024 under Sections 420/468/471 IPC PS Jaitpur, Badarpur, New Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
ANISH DAYAL, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024/MK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 10:43:31
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No.303/2024 under Sections 420/468/471 IPC be quashed given a settlement (MoU dated 05.08.2024) between the parties resolving the property dispute?
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Gorakh Thakur & Ors.
State of NCT of Delhi
Anr. (complainant)
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
