A petition against a Section 138 NI Act order of acquittal. The Court observed the Trial Court concluded the accused rebutted the presumption regarding the underlying transaction. Leave to appeal was granted and the petition disposed of.
Leave to appeal granted; Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Mr. Prabhas Kumar, Advocate for appellant.
versus
POOJA GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 20.09.2024
CRL.L.P. 64/2021
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 07:32:16
CRL.A._______/2024 (Registry to number the appeal)
ANISH DAYAL, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024/RK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 07:32:16
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal against acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case should be granted.
Whether the Trial Court successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MOHAR SINGH
POOJA GUPTA
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
