Petitioner sought to quash an IPC FIR. The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Petition for quashing of FIR under Section 528 BNS 2023 dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
DINESH KUMAR SACHDEVA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prag Chawla, Ms. Jaspreet Kaur and Ms. Muskan Aggarwal, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Ajay Kumar, P.S.Tuqlak Road.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
%
O R D E R 23.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:22:24
petition had been filed consequent to directions in the Contempt Petition filed against the petitioner, however, since the respondent Nos.2 & 3 are not forthcoming to abide by their part of MOU, the entire MOU stands vitiated.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 rk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:22:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing of FIR under Section 528 BNS 2023 should be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dinesh Kumar Sachdeva
The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
