Petitioner challenged lack of cognizance. Court recorded order dated 13.05.2024 dismissing the petition as nothing remained for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
SARVAN KUMAR VARSHNEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr Arjun Syal, Ms. Mehaak Jaggi, Mr. Shashi Kant and Mr. Aman Dhall, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashwini and Mr. Rahul Kochar, Advocates. Mr. Vikhyat Oberoi and Ms Nishita Gupta, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM:
% 14.10.2024
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that
the chargesheet has been filed after completion of the investigation but no cognizance has been taken by the learned MM-06, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide order dated 13th May, 2024 qua the petitioner and therefore, nothing is left for further adjudication in the instant petition.
The order dated 13th May, 2024 be taken on record.
Accordingly, the instant petition along with pending application(s) is
disposed of.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
OCTOBER 14, 2024 Rk/av Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 12:01:33
Sarvan Kumar Varshney
State of NCT of Delhi
Chandra Dhar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
