Writ petition seeking premature release under the Remission Policy was disposed of. The court noted the petitioner's case was under active consideration by the Sentence Review Board in light of a Coordinate Bench decision, rendering no further order necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 09.10.2024
W.P.(CRL) 3043/2024 and CRL.M.A. 29595/2024
“ A. Issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to the Respondent to consider the case of the Petitioner for premature release under the policy dated 16.7.04;
B. Issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to the State Government and direct the release of the petitioner under the policy of premature release dated 16.7.04 forthwith .”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:25:29
of (Govt. NCT of Delhi), WP (Crl.) No.72/2024 dated 08.01.2024 , the petitioner’s case is under active consideration with the competent authority in terms of Clause 3.2 of the Remission Policy No.F.18/5/94/Home(Genl) dated 16.07.2004. Learned ASC confirms that it will be considered in the next meeting of the Sentence Review Board (SRB), if not already considered.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
OCTOBER 9, 2024 akc
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:25:29
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the State Government to release the petitioner for premature release under the furlough policy.
Whether the petitioner's case for premature release falls under Clause 3.2 of the Remission Policy.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rani @ Manju Vs. StateReferred¶11
Rani @ Manju Vs. State of (Govt. NCT of Delhi), WP (Crl.) No.72/2024 dated 08.01.2024
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shamshad
State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
