Allowed

Jatin Arora v. State NCT of Delhi Anr. & Anr.

Delhi HC15 Oct 2024W.P.(CRL)/1442/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order quashed an FIR under specific IPC sections regarding cheating and forgery. The court allowed the petition based on a settlement between parties and the remote chances of conviction, deeming further proceedings a misuse of court process.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 257/2014 PS Hauz Khas under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B IPC and proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Jatin Arora Vs State NCT of Delhi Anr. & Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~58

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 1442/2021

¶4

JATIN ARORA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. K.R. Roma, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE NCT OF DELHI ANR & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State with Mr. Alok Sharma and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advs. with SI Suraj, PS Hauz Khas. Mr. Arya Handik, Mr. Rituvendra Singh, Ms. Anchal Khanna and Mr. Rajeev Ahuja, Advs. for R-2.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶9

O R D E R % 15.10.2024

¶10

This petition has been filed for seeking quashing of FIR No. 257/2014 PS Hauz Khas under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B IPC basis settlement arrived at between the parties dated 10^th March, 2021, which is on record of this Court.

¶11

Petitioner and respondent No.2 both appeared through VC duly identified by IO and their respective counsels.

¶12

Respondent No.2 states that she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

¶13

Considering the above settlement between the parties and the chances of conviction of the petitioners being remote and bleak, there is no use

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:31:39

¶15

continuing with proceedings of the present FIR as it would be a misuse of the process of the Court and an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Consequently, the FIR No. 257/2014 PS Hauz Khas under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B IPC and proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶16

Parties shall abide by the terms of settlement.

¶17

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Pending applications (if any) are disposed of as infructuous.

¶18

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶19

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶20

OCTOBER 15, 2024/MK

¶21

Jatin Arora v. State NCT of Delhi Anr. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatin Arora v. State NCT of Delhi Anr. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarvan Kumar Varshney Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Pirtam Singh Vs State of Delhi & Anr.

Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs Union of India and Ors.

Atul Kumar Gupta Vs Union of India and Ors.

Akansha Sharma and Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Dr. Azeem Vs State

Kiran & Anr. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Sumit Sharma & Anr. Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

Ravi Kapoor Vs State & Ors.

Hitesh Pratap Singh Chauhan Vs State NCT of Delhi

Sandeep@Deepu Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Prem Chhabra Vs the State of NCT of Delhi through SHO

Suraj Kumar & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Ashish Saxena Vs Monika Saxena & Anr.