Dismissed

Deepak Mann v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi )

Delhi HC14 Feb 2024W.P.(CRL)/506/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought parole or furlough extension citing wife's surgery. State counsel noted surgery was postponed at patient's request. Court granted leave to withdraw petition with liberty to reapply, dismissing the petition and extending existing furlough.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw petition with liberty to file fresh application; existing furlough extended till 15.02.2024; surrender ordered.

Deepak Mann Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi ) — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~63

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 506/2024

¶4

DEEPAK MANN ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Harish Kohli, Advocate (through VC).

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC (criminal) for the State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Advocates. SI Mandeep Kumar, PS Punjabi Bagh.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 14.02.2024

¶11

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the CrPC seeks the following prayers:-

¶12

“In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully and humbly prayed that this Hon‟ble Court may be pleased to:

¶13

(i) Allow the present petition and issue writ /order /direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondent to either grant of parole for a period of 2 months or extension of furlough for a period of 2 months, whichever deems fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶14

(ii) Pass such other writ/order/direction as this Hon‟ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice & equity.”

¶15

The petitioner appeared in person on the last date of hearing, i.e., on 13.02.2024 and handed over documents in relation to his wife‟s surgery to learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State for verification.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:45:57

¶18

Pursuant thereto, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State has handed up in Court, status report dated 14.02.0224 authored by SHO, PS Punjabi Bagh wherein it is stated that the said documents have been verified. The said status report is taken on record.

¶19

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State, on instructions, submits that the surgery of the petitioner‟s wife was postponed at request of the patient herself.

¶20

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file a fresh application before the concerned authority, if the need arises, in accordance with law.

¶21

Leave and liberty granted.

¶22

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶23

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶24

In the meantime, the furlough granted to the petitioner is extended till 15.02.2024.

¶25

The petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Jail Authorities by 04:00 PM on 15.02.2024.

¶26

Order be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information and compliance.

¶27

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith.

¶28

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶29

FEBRUARY 14, 2024/ sn

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:45:57

Deepak Mann v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi )

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Mann v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi )

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mrs. Moushmi Dey & Anr. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Mrs. Minkal Kaur Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Hansraj Surana Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Saurabh Bhatia and Others Vs the State and Another

Ekta Tiwari Vs the State & Ors.

Dev Prakash Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sanjeet Vs Gnct of Delhi and Ors. & Anr.

Mrinal Kumar Arora and Ors. Vs State through SHO Ps Mahendra Park and Anr.

Mohit & Ors. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Brahm Pal Vs State

Sai Ramakrishna Karuturi Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Pappu Singh Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.