A writ petition (criminal) was withdrawn by the petitioner with court permission and dismissed as withdrawn; the order decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik, Mr. Mishal Johari, Mr. Harsh Vashisht, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Apoorv Kurup, Mr. Farhan Ali, Mr. Akhil Hasija and Ms. Gauri Govurdhun, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
MANOJ JAIN, J
JANUARY 25, 2024/ sw
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 12:00:09
Anubhav Gupta
Union of India
Respondent 2
Suresh Kumar Kait
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
