Allowed

Smt. Rajvati v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC23 Jan 2024W.P.(CRL)/225/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 and Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought production of her 14-year-old missing daughter. After reviewing police status reports confirming efforts to trace the girl and filing of a fresh FIR, the court disposed of the petition directing police to file monthly status reports with the Magistrate and ensure the girl's production for custody if rescued.

What did the court decide?

The petition was allowed and disposed of, directing police officials to file a monthly status report before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate and ensure production of the rescued girl before the M

Smt. Rajvati Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Child Custody and Guardianship | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~15

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of decision: 23.01.2024

¶4

- W.P.(CRL) 225/2024

¶5

SMT. RAJVATI ..... Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr.Shubham Prajapati, Mr.Rakesh Kumar Mandal, Mr.Phillip Massey, Mr.Mukesh Ranjan, Mr.Manish Sharma, Mr.Diwakar Chaurasia & Mr.Sanjay Rana, Advs.

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal & Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Advs. Insp.Deepak PS Kalindi Kunj.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶11

J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶12

Crl.M.A.2074/2024 (exemption)

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

Application stands disposed of.

¶15

W.P.(CRL) 225/2024

¶16

Present petition has been filed as Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions to the respondent to produce missing minor daughter of the petitioner.

¶17

W.P.(CRL) 225/2024

¶18

Page 1 of 3

¶19

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR Signing Da te:2 4.01.2024 13:09

¶20

The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that on 27.12.2023, petitioner’s minor daughter, aged 14 years, went missing from home and did not return back. Accordingly, a complaint towards the same was lodged at police station Kalindi Kunj which culminated into FIR No.752/2023 for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC. Subsequently, the minor daughter of the petitioner was rescued by the police officials of police station Kalindi Kunj and on 31.12.2023, she was produced before the Child Welfare Committee for counseling and was handed over to the petitioner on 01.01.2024.

¶21

Learned counsel further submits that on 10.01.2024 at around 5:00 pm, minor daughter of the petitioner again went missing from home. Accordingly, a complaint vide DD No.77 dated 12.01.2024, i.e. after two days of the incident, was lodged, however, no satisfactory response was given and the police has not made any effort to find out the whereabouts of her minor daughter till date.

¶22

Notice issued.

¶23

Mr.Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent and has placed status report dated 23.01.2024 before this Court, wherein it is stated that upon the complaint dated 12.01.2024, FIR No.26/2024 was registered at the police station Kalindi Kunj for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC.

¶24

Learned Standing Counsel for the State has pointed out that earlier on 30.12.2023, upon the complaint of petitioner, FIR No.752/2023 was registered at police station Kalindi Kunj for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC, however, on 31.12.2023, the said girl was rescued by the staff of police station Kalindi Kunj and further counseling was also done.

¶25

W.P.(CRL) 225/2024

¶26

Page 2 of 3

¶27

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR Signing Da te:2 4.01.2024 13:09

¶28

On 01.01.2024, she was produced before the Court and statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded wherein she did not accuse anyone. On same day, she was produced before the CWC, Kalkaji wherein after counseling, her custody was handed over to the petitioner.

¶29

Learned Standing Counsel further submits that during investigation, notice of CDR/SDR of suspect’s IMEI number was sent to TSU cell, South East District, New Delhi and after obtaining the same, no SIM was found working on the said IMEI.

¶30

The status report dated 23.01.2024 is taken on record and we have perused the same.

¶31

In light of the aforesaid and since all possible efforts to trace the missing girl have been made and the FIR is pending investigation, we hereby dispose of the present writ petition directing the concerned police officials to file a monthly status report before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate and if any clue is found about the minor daughter of the petitioner, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner and if the missing girl is rescued, she shall be produced before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate.

¶32

With directions as aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

¶33

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)

JUDGE

(MANOJ JAIN)

JUDGE

JANUARY 23, 2024/ab

¶38

W.P.(CRL) 225/2024

¶39

Page 3 of 3

¶40

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR Signing Da te:2 4.01.2024 13:09

Smt. Rajvati v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Rajvati v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Singh @ Raju Vs State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)

Nazam Vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

Ankit Garg and Others Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Shivam Kumar Vishnoi & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Anr. & Ors.

Mohd. Shakeel Vs State (Govt.of NCT of Delhi)

Usman Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Chander Kant Jha Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Shantanu Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

State of NCT of Delhi Vs Tarun Kumar and Ors.

State Vs Kuldeep

Amit Vashisht Vs State (Govt of Nct) of Delhi (through Ps Special Cell) & Anr.

Reeta Devi Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Noor Jahan Vs State & Ors.