Disposed

Mohammad Yasin Malik v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC14 Feb 2024W.P.(CRL)/363/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition seeking medical treatment for a jailed petitioner was disposed of on the respondents' statement that the petitioner had been examined at AIIMS and treated per rules, with directions to jail authorities to provide requisite medical treatment as and when required.

What did the court decide?

Directions to jail authorities to provide requisite medical treatment as and when required, in accordance with law.

Mohammad Yasin Malik Vs Union of India & Ors. — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~42

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 363/2024

¶4

MOHAMMAD YASIN MALIK ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Rais Farooqui, Mr. M. Asad Beig, Mr. Anil Kumar, Mr.Khalid Azeez, Mr.Chandra Gupta Maurya, Mohd. Fatir, Mr.Yogesh Kumar and Mr.L.S.Farooqui, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Tushar Mehta and Mr.Chetan Sharma, ASGs and Mr.Apporv Kurup, CGSC with Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Mr. Akhil Hasija, Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, Ms. Muskan Gupta, Ms. Gauri Goburdhun, Mr. Aparna Arun, Mr. Gujas Narula and Ms. Aanchal, Advocates and Mr. Sahaj Garg, G.P. for UOI. Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Advocates

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R

¶7

% 14.02.2024

¶8

Pursuant to the orders passed by this Court on 02.02.2024, medical status report of the petitioner has been filed alongwith treatment provided to the petitioner. Also a supplementary medical status report dated 13.02.2024 has been submitted in the court today whereby it is informed that the petitioner was got examined at AIIMS and necessary medical treatment has been accorded, in accordance with rules.

¶9

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that petition can be

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:46:01

¶12

disposed of with directions to the jail authorities to provide requisite medical treatment to the petitioner, as and when required, in accordance with law. Taking the statement of learned counsel for the respondents on record, petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶13

A copy this order be forwarded to Superintendent Jail, concerned for information and compliance.

¶14

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J

¶15

FEBRUARY 14, 2024/v

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:46:01

Mohammad Yasin Malik v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Yasin Malik v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mrs. Moushmi Dey & Anr. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Mrs. Minkal Kaur Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Hansraj Surana Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Saurabh Bhatia and Others Vs the State and Another

Ekta Tiwari Vs the State & Ors.

Dev Prakash Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sanjeet Vs Gnct of Delhi and Ors. & Anr.

Rakesh Kumar Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sanoj Haldar @ Sanju Vs the State of Delhi

Hansraj Surana Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Harkesh Kumar Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Vijay Gupta and Ors. Vs State and Anr.