Regular bail application in a robbery case where complainant's mobile phone was recovered from the applicant and he was identified in judicial TIP. Charges not yet framed; allegations held serious. Bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
RAVINDER KUMAR YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ramesh Rawat & Ms. Geetanjali, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R % 13.02.2024
CRL.M.A. 4561/2024 & 4562/2024 (for exemption)
BAIL APPLN. 523/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:59:35
was registered on the complaint of one Mr. Pankaj who had alleged that on 20.07.2023, when he was retuning his home from his workplace and when he had reached near Satguru Ram Singh Metro Station at about 10:45 PM, one boy had come and asked for a matchbox from the complainant. Thereafter, 2-3 other boys had also surrounded the complainant and had robbed his purse containing Rs.5,000/-, identity cards as well as his mobile phone. As alleged, the accused persons had also attacked the complainant by some sharp object and had caused injury to him on his head. On these allegations, the present FIR was registered.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:59:35
injury was also caused on his head by the accused persons, including the present applicant. The mobile phone of the complainant was recovered from the possession of the present accused/applicant, and recovery of other robbed articles as well as weapon was made from his associates/co-accused persons. It is also important to note that the complainant in the present case has identified the present applicant in the judicial Test Identification Parade. 10. Considering the fact that the charges are yet to be framed and evidence is yet to be recorded, and since the allegations are serious in nature, no ground for grant of bail is made out, at this stage.
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2024/ hs
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:59:35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the applicant in FIR No. 209/2023 for robbery under Sections 394/34 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravinder Kumar Yadav
The State of NCT of Delhi
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
