Disposed
Sonu Sonkar v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/447/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought four weeks' parole to consummate his marriage and maintain social ties. The writ petition was treated as a representation to be decided by the concerned authority within 15 days, and was disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition to be treated as representation, decided within 15 days by concerned authority.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~62
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 447/2024
¶4
- SONU SONKAR ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Arpit Batra and Ms. Abhilasha, Advocates
¶6
- versus
¶7
STATE ..... Respondent
¶8
Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State.
¶9
CORAM:
¶10
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
¶11
O R D E R % 08.02.2024
¶12
CRL.M.A. 4076/2024 (exemption)
¶13
- Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sonu Sonkar
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Swarana Kanta Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court