Petitioners sought quashing of FIR under Sections 354/452/323/354B/34 IPC arising from a property dispute, based on a settlement deed. Respondents confirmed voluntary settlement without coercion; one respondent had died. The court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
Through: Mr. Anil Sehgal and Mr. Lalit Khurana, Advocates
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for the State with SI Deepak Kumar, P.S. Burari.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
CRL.M.A. 4477/2023 (exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 484/2023
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:37:51
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:37:51
emanating therefrom are quashed.
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2024/zp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:37:51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 1317/2015 and proceedings arising therefrom should be quashed in view of amicable settlement between the parties.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sushil Tyagi & Ors.
State of NCT of Delhi
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
