The petition challenging a 2018 summoning order under Section 482 Cr.P.C was dismissed due to delay and the availability of an alternate remedy before the Sessions Judge. The petition fathered from 2018 to 2024 was considered unsustainable.
Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, Ld. APP for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 03.09.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 3, 2024/va
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:15:05
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C filed after a prolonged delay challenging a summoning order of 2018 should be entertained.
Whether the petitioner is required to approach the learned Sessions Judge first as an alternate remedy before approaching the High Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sonia
State of NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
