The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal writ petition. The Court granted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition and the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
Through: Mr. Nishant Rao and Ms. Tarini Khurana, Advocates.
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State with Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Arijit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats and Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advocates with Inspector Ajay Kumar SI, Sunil Kumar, PS Najafgarh.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 02.09.2024
W.P.(CRL) 1469/2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 2, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:23:15
2 provisions across 2 enactments
MR JANESH KUMAR
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
