A petition under Article 226 seeking to stop a criminal investigation was dismissed in default as no-one appeared for the petitioner and the investigation had concluded with a charge sheet.
The petition was dismissed in default as no lawyer appeared for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
MAKISUDDIN AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: None
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC for the State
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 03.09.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 3, 2024/PT
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:23:11
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Makisuddin and Ors
State of NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
