Petition for premature release under Remission Policy disposed of as the State confirmed the petitioner's sentence had been remitted and he had already been released based on Sentence Reviewing Board recommendations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
JEETU SAINI .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Vivya Nagpal, Advocate.
versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats and Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advocates alongwith SI Anil Kumar, P.S. Special Staff/West.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
% 11.11.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2024 at 11:57:15
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
NOVEMBER 11, 2024
ga
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2024 at 11:57:15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to directions for premature release under the Remission Policy.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jeetu Saini
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
