Dismissed
Manoj Kumar v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./3467/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition withdrawn as charge had been framed and a revision petition filed before the Sessions Court; dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn with leave granted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~32
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.M.C. 3467/2023, CRL.M.A. 13048/2023
¶4
MANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arsh Bhalla and Mr. Kunal Shahi, Advs. (Mob. 9711575152)
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Ankit Singh and ASI Bal Kishan, PS Nangloi.
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
¶9
% 24.09.2024
¶10
- Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition since charge has been framed before the learned trial court and revision petition has also been filed before the learned Sessions Court.
¶11
- Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Manoj Kumar
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court