Dismissed
Meenakshi v. State and Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./4756/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal revision petition after charge was framed by the trial court and a separate revision petition filed before the Sessions Court. Leave granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~33
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.M.C. 4756/2023, CRL.M.A. 18178/2023
¶4
- MEENAKSHI .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Arsh Bhalla and Mr. Kunal Shahi, Advs. (Mob. 9711575152)
¶6
versus
¶7
STATE AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Ankit Singh and ASI Bal Kishan, PS Nangloi.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
¶10
- Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition since charge has been framed before the learned trial court and revision petition has also been filed before the learned Sessions Court.
¶11
- Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Meenakshi
- respondent
State
- respondent
Anr.
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court