Petitioner challenged an interim maintenance order of Rs. 7,500. High Court found no ground to interfere as the trial court application was pending and permit petitioner to urge contentions only.
Petitioner dismissed; liberty granted to urge contentions before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~85
versus
CORAM:
% 23.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 12:00:38
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024/ rd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 12:00:38
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with an ad-interim maintenance order pending before the Trial Court.
Whether the petitioner's employment status justifies quashing the interim maintenance order.
Sirish Kumar
Ashna Manoram
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
