Petition sought direction for further investigation in an FIR under various IPC sections by an independent agency. The Court noted charges were framed in 2017, the trial was well underway with only four witnesses left, and declined to allow the petition, dismissing it in the interest of concluding the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
MS AB & ANR. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sarim Naved, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF OELHI) & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nadita Rao, ASC for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:32:17
ANISH DAYAL, J
JULY 24, 2024/RK
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:32:17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further investigation of FIR 10/2016 by an independent agency should be directed when trial is at its last stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MS AB
ANR.
THE STATE (NCT OF OELHI)
ORS.
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
