Allowed

Sandeep v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC24 Jul 2024CRL.M.C./2340/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought quashing of FIR No.78/2019 PS Ranhola under Section 376 IPC following settlement between parties, with marriage verified by the State. The Court quashed the FIR as conviction chances were remote and proceedings would burden the exchequer.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.78/2019 PS Ranhola under S. 376 IPC and proceedings emanating therefrom quashed; pending applications disposed as infructuous

Sandeep Vs State NCT of Delhi — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 2340/2024

¶4

SANDEEP .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Akhilesh Kr. Pandey and Mr. Ram Anugrah Pandey, Advs.

¶6

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Adv Mohit Sindhu, Adv Kadam, Adv Silky Gupta, Adv Bijender Kumar Jindal, Adv Mansi Mittal, Adv Gurjot Singh Bhatia with SI Priyanka, PS Ranhola.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶8

O R D E R % 24.07.2024

¶9

This petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.78/2019 PS Ranhola under Section 376 IPC on grounds of settlement between the parties dated 25^th January, 2024.

¶10

As per the previous order, the status report had to be filed regarding verification of the factum of marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2.

¶11

The APP for the State states on instructions that the marriage certificate has been verified and according to the said certificate, the marriage was solemnised on 12^th June, 2020. The petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 are present in Court and duly identified by the IO who

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:55:47

¶14

confirm the same.

¶15

Considering the above settlement between the parties and the chances of conviction of the petitioners being remote and bleak, there is no use continuing with proceedings of the present FIR as it would be a misuse of the process of the Court and an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Consequently, the FIR No.78/2019 PS Ranhola under Section 376 IPC and proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶16

Parties shall abide by the terms of settlement.

¶17

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Pending applications (if any) are disposed of as infructuous.

¶18

Dasti .

¶19

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶20

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶21

JULY 24, 2024/MK

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:55:47

Sandeep v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitesh Singh Vs Archana Rawat

Kareena and Anr. Vs Commisioner of Police and Ors.

Smt Chandni & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ms Ab & Anr. Vs the State (Nct of Oelhi) & Ors.

Ishwar Vs State NCT of Delhi

Amit Saluja and Anr. Vs the State and Anr.