The petitioners sought liberty to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The court granted the application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
MRS. MADHU DEVI AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Akhtar Hussain, Advocate through VC.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mrs. R. Rama, Mr. B.P. Agarwal, Mrs. Sharanjit Kaur Shergil, Mr. Abhishek Singh and Ms. Anjali Verma, Advocates. Insp. Mukesh Kumar, P.S. Janakpuri.
Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Mr. Priyanshu, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 23.07.2024
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
JULY 23, 2024/ MR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:45:00
MRS. MADHU DEVI AND ORS
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
