The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal writ petition. The court granted the permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
JANAK RAJ DHAMI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jyoti Tewari, Adv. with petitioner in person.
versus
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE LICENSING UNIT, NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC, Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advs. for State with SI Ramanand, Licensing Unit
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the submissions made, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 rb/dg
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:55:53
Janak Raj Dhami
The Joint Commissioner of Police Licensing Unit, New Delhi
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
