Disposed

Vinit and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC11 Sept 2024W.P.(CRL)/2816/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR registered on a matrimonial dispute after the parties reached an oral settlement. The complainant affirmed the settlement in court. Relying on Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, the court held continuation served no purpose and quashed the FIR and proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.112/2014 dated 10.02.2014, PS Sarai Rohilla, and all proceedings emanating therefrom quashed; petition disposed with pending applications.

Vinit and Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~92

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2816/2024 VINIT AND ORS. .....Petitioners

¶4

Through: Ms. Sanigdha Sood Madan (D/3191/13), DHCLSC, Mr. Sumit Madan (D/4822/18) and Mr. Rajnish Kumar, Advocates with Petitionersin-person.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State. Respondent No.2 in person SI Manish Tanwar, D-6694, PS Sarai Rohilla

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 11.09.2024 CRL.M.A. 27515/2024 (Exemption)

¶10

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

W.P.(CRL) 2816/2024

¶12

The Petitioners have approached this Court for quashing FIR No.112/2014 dated 10.02.2014 registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 354B, 506 & 34 IPC. The present FIR is the outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the parties.

¶13

It is stated that the parties have resolved their disputes by way of an oral settlement entered into between the parties. It is stated that Respondent

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:48:38

¶15

No.2/Complainant who was the wife of Petitioner No.3, has agreed to settle all the disputes with the Petitioners and an oral settlement has been entered into between the parties. It is stated that no other case is pending between the parties and no acrimony survives between the parties.

¶16

The Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant are present in Court today. The parties have been identified by the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2/Complainant states that she has settled all her disputes with the Petitioners out of her own free will, without pressure, coercion or undue influence. The parties undertake that they will remain bound by the terms of the settlement arrived at between them and the proceedings recorded before this Court 4. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and also in view of the fact that the instant case is squarely covered by the law laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303 , this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the present proceedings. Resultantly, the FIR No.112/2014 dated 10.02.2014 registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 354B, 506 & 34 IPC and the proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

¶17

With these observations, the petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.

¶18

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶19

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 hsk

¶20

Vinit and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinit and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Shankar and Ors. Vs State Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

Naresh Mohan Singla Vs Smt Ranjana Bhatia

Sh. Abhishek Verma Alias Abhishek Kumar Verma and Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Bhupinder Singh Vs the State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Firoz Saifi @ Mohd. Asif & Anr. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Eti Tiwari Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Janak Raj Dhami Vs the Joint Commissioner of Police Licensing Unit, New Delhi

Ankit Garg Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Vishnudev Sardar Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Farman Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Amit Chandi Vs Aarti Chandi @ Aarti Khanna

Anjali @ Chanda Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Geeta Gupta Vs M/S Nivedan Fin Invest Lease Ltd.

Geeta Gupta Vs M/S Nivedan Fin Invest Lease Ltd.