Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition as the reliefs sought have been satisfied. The high court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without addressing substantive legal questions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
JASHANJIT KAUR GILL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Avneesh Garg & Mr. Harsh Pal, Advocates.
versus
DY. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC, Crl. with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate for State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 13.09.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:36:36
Jashanjit Kaur Gill
DY. Commissioner of Police
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
