Petitioners sought withdrawal of their petition to quash FIR No. 336/2021 (Sections 323/341/506/308/34 IPC, PS Adarsh Nagar). Petitioners confirmed withdrawal in Court; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn and the application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
KALLU@ MANOJ@ MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Saumya Jain, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC (CRL) for State with Mr. Amit Peswani, Advocate with SI Anand Swaroop, PS: Adarsh Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 15.07.2024
CRL.M.A. 20375/2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
JULY 15, 2024/RK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:06:06
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kallu@ Manoj@ Manoj Kumar & Ors.
The State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Ors.
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
