Petition against an ad-interim maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC. Since the interim application remained pending before the Trial Court, the court declined interference and dismissed the petition, leaving quantum of maintenance open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
SHRI AVHSESH KUMAR PUNDIR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Arpit Sharma and Ms.Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocates
versus
SMT. RAJNI KUMARI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Respondent No.1 through V.C.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R % 20.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 11:31:29
months and by now substantial arrears have accrued.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024
na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 11:31:29
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with an ad-interim maintenance order while the interim maintenance application remains pending before the Trial Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Avhsesh Kumar Pundir
Smt. Rajni Kumari
Respondent No. 2
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
