Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their income-tax-related petition, having earlier withdrawn a petition challenging the sanction as infructuous. The court granted liberty to file an afresh amended petition and dismissed the present petition as withdrawn with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
MAHAGUN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR......Petitioners Through: Mr. Gagan Kumar, Ms. Puja Jakhar and Mr. Gagandeep R.M., Advocates.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER (ITO), CIRCLE-75(1), NEW DELHI .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Viplav Acharya, Jr. St. Counsel, Mr. Shivansh K. Pandya, Jr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
% 19.09.2024
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 ga
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:22:23
MAHAGUN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR
INCOME TAX OFFICER (ITO), CIRCLE-75(1), NEW DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
