Dismissed

Harish Chawala v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC20 Sept 2024CRL.M.C./6964/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed the withdrawal of a petition seeking quashing of an FIR registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, and 34 IPC. The court granted leave to raise contentions at the appropriate stage before dismissing the petition.

What did the court decide?

Leave and liberty to raise all contentions at the appropriate stage granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Harish Chawala Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 6964/2024 & CRL. MAs 26598-99/2024 HARISH CHAWALA .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Jha, Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Pandey and Mr. Raman Kumar Singh, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R

¶9

% 20.09.2024

¶10

By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No.433/2023 registered under Sections 420/467/468/471/506/34 IPC at P.S. Mohan Garden, Delhi.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner has extensively argued the matter and stated that the allegations alleged in the FIR are false as well as the ingredients of the offence levelled are not made out and in particular, he refers to the decisions in Vikram Johar v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, reported as (2019) 14 SCC 207 ; Kanshi Ram v. State, MANU/DE/0566/2000 ; and Amitabh Adhar and Others v. NCT of Delhi &

¶12

Others, MANU/DE/1042/2000 to submit that in her statement, the complainant states that she was alarmed to such an extent that the ingredients of offence under Section 506 IPC are fulfilled. He has also drawn the attention of the Court to the statement of father of the complainant wherein he has stated that it was a misunderstanding.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:05:19

¶15

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states, upon instructions, that he seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all such contentions at the appropriate stage.

¶16

Leave and liberty, as prayed for, is granted. The petition along with pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶17

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶18

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024/ rd

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:05:19

Harish Chawala v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harish Chawala v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritesh Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Mahagun India Private Limited & Anr. Vs Income Tax Officer (Ito), CIRCLE-75(1), New Delhi

Prakash Kumar Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Pappu Saroj Vs Ragini Saroj

Anil Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Naveen Sharma & Ors. Vs Puja Sharma