Writ petition dismissed in default for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared and the petitioner appeared not to wish to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
J .....Petitioner
Through: None
versus
THE STATE [GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI] & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Anand V.Khatri, ASC for the State with Ms.Neelu, Advocate alongwith SI Rooma Yadav, P.S.Nangloi
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to take a Passover or an adjournment.
It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter any further.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
DECEMBER 5, 2024 Dy/ht..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 11:49:14
J
THE STATE [GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI]
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
