Disposed

Tanya Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC24 Jul 2024W.P.(CRL)/2152/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held in an oral habeas corpus petition, the court laid down interim custody arrangements for a child separated from his mother who transferred to AIIMS Guwahati. The court permitted limited visitation and residence in Delhi pending further orders by a competent Family Court.

What did the court decide?

Interim custody arrangement permitting mother to take child to Delhi for 3-4 days subject to conditions, return by 26th July 2024.

Tanya Sharma Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Child Custody and Guardianship | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of Decision: 24^th July, 2024

¶4

- W.P.(CRL) 2152/2024

¶5

TANYA SHARMA .....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Yogesh Lohchab, Adv. (M: 9899406506) with Petitioner in person.

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Adv. for State. Mr. Deepak Khadara, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶11

Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral)

¶12

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶13

The present habeas corpus petition has been filed by Ms. Tanya Sharma, the wife of Mr. Aayush Sharma (Respondent no. 2) seeking production of her child Master ‘S’ who is stated to be 2 years and 4 months old.

¶14

The case of the Petitioner is that she has not been allowed to meet her child. The Petitioner, her husband/Respondent No. 2 and the child are present in Court and the Court has held an in-chamber hearing with them.

¶15

It has emerged from the interaction with the couple and with the child are that the child is quite comfortable with both the parents i.e.,

¶16

Signature Not Verified

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

W.P.(CRL) 2152/2024

¶19

Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Da te:2 5.07.2024 17:15

¶20

mother/Petitioner and the father/Respondent no. 2. The Petitioner is working in AIIMS, Guwahati as a Nursing Officer with effect from December, 2023. Prior to that, she was working as a Nursing Officer with Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, however, upon obtaining a government job, she expressed that she wished to join AIIMS, Guwahati, which led to her separation from her child and her husband, as also the matrimonial home.

¶21

Respondent No. 2 is working in a private MNC in NOIDA in Sector62. According to Respondent No. 2, Master ‘S’ is attending a play-school namely ‘Naughty Genius Day Care and Play School, East Patel Nagar’ . The respondent no.2 lives with his parents in East Patel Nagar. He is also stated to have an elder sister.

¶22

It is a matter of fact that the mother has not had regular interactions and meetings with the child and proceedings for divorce between the parties are already pending before the Family Court. The Petitioner has also filed a complaint in respect of allegations of dowry against the Respondent No. 2 and his family.

¶23

In these circumstances, since the child has been produced before the Court, the Court is only inclined to put in place an interim arrangement, subject to further orders that may be passed by a competent Court. Under these circumstances, the following interim measures are put in place:

¶24

i. Whenever the Petitioner-mother wishes to travel to Delhi for a continuous period of 5 to 6 days, she would be permitted to take the child with her and live with her parents in the Karol Bagh, i.e., her maternal residence for a maximum period of 3 to 4 days. If the period is to be extended, the same shall be done only with the consent of the father-Respondent. During such period, the Petitioner would ensure

¶25

Signature Not Verified

¶26

Page 2 of 4

¶27

W.P.(CRL) 2152/2024

¶28

Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Da te:2 5.07.2024 17:15

¶29

unhindered communication between the child and the father. The Petitioner shall give at least one week advance notice of the dates when she would be coming to delhi for meeting the child and for keeping the child with her.

¶30

ii. The Petitioner-mother shall ensure that during this period, if the play school of the child is functional or working, the child is sent to school on a daily basis and he doesn’t miss his school.

¶31

iii. Upon expiry of a maximum period of 4 days, the child shall be returned to the custody of the father/Respondent no. 2 or the father can pick up the child from the Petitioner’s maternal residence.

¶32

iv. The Petitioner, if she visits the husband’s home to meet the child or pick up the child, shall not in any manner engage in any form of abuse with the in-laws. The parties shall maintain cordial atmosphere with the in-laws which shall apply to husband/Respondent No. 2 also when he visits the wife’s maternal home.

¶33

v. Both the father and mother, shall not remove the child from India.

¶34

The Petitioner’s name shall be reflected in all the records including school records of the child as the mother of the child.

¶35

Parties are left to avail of their remedies under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

¶36

Since the mother/Petitioner has travelled from Guwahati and is staying in Delhi currently, the mother may take the child and return the custody of the child by 26th July, 2024 in the evening i.e., by 5:00 p.m to the custody of the father/Respondent no. 2.

¶37

Signature Not Verified

¶38

Page 3 of 4

¶39

W.P.(CRL) 2152/2024

¶40

Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Da te:2 5.07.2024 17:15

¶41

If there is any violation of this order or if any modification is needed, liberty is reserved for parties to approach the Court by way of an application. 12. The petition is disposed of. All pending applications are disposed of.

¶42

PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE

¶43

AMIT SHARMA JUDGE

¶44

JULY 24, 2024 dj/dn/Pc

¶45

Signature Not Verified

¶46

Page 4 of 4

¶47

W.P.(CRL) 2152/2024

¶48

Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Da te:2 5.07.2024 17:15

Tanya Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tanya Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Madhu Devi and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Venus Consulting Solution Pvt. Ltd. Vs State and Another

Kareena and Anr. Vs Commisioner of Police and Ors.

Smt Chandni & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Jainsons Electricals Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Amita Lamba & Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Uvesh Vs State of NCT of Delhi

MD Kasib and Ors. Vs the State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Vikas Kumar Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi and Others

Sourabh Chandrakar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Pankaj Kumar Jha Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shabana Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

MD Heydaitullah Vs National Investigation Agency

Vijay Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.