Counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Permission to withdraw granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
MANMOHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kanwarpreet Singh, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 11.11.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
NOVEMBER 11, 2024 DU
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/11/2024 at 11:57:36
Manmohan
State of NCT of Delhi
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
