On a petition for habeas corpus filed by a husband seeking production of his wife after she ceased cohabitation, the High Court noted her appearance and stated desire not to return. Petition was allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 1982/2024
SHIVAM .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sagar Dawar and Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocates
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC(Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advocates for State SI Mr. Sandeep Kumar, PS Kanjhawla
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 05.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:09:34
recorded. A Status Report dated 05th July, 2024, has also been handed over in Court today and is taken on record.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
AMIT SHARMA, J.
JULY 05, 2024/ tp/pr/ks
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:09:34
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain a habeas corpus petition filed by a husband seeking production of his wife after she stopped cohabitation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SHIVAM
STATE NCT OF DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
AMIT SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
