Withdrawal order deciding nothing of general application. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's request, with the court granting permission to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
Through: Mr. J P Singh with Mr. Himanshu Singh and Mr Dhamija, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Kamal Digpaul and Ms. Ishita Pathak, Advocates for UOI.
Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma with Ms. Akshay Jeba Kumar, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 18.01.2024
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
MANOJ JAIN, J
JANUARY 18, 2024/ sw
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:19:20
Rakesh Dahiya
Union of India
Suresh Kumar Kait
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
