The High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an order denying bail and granting 60 days parole for preparing an SLP. The court noted that the petitioner had already availed two furloughs and free legal aid was available, rendering the petition without merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KRISHAN KUMAR MALIK ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Adv.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State with SI Ravi Saini Crime Branch
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 01.07.2024 1. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 read with Section 482 of the C.r.P.C for quashing of Order dated 09.02.2024 bearing No.F.18/88/2023/HG/362-63 issued by the respondent denying the Bail and for a parole of a period of 60 days is sought by the petitioner.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:47:33
May, 2024. The impugned order records fairly that the only ground given for furlough is that he wants to engage a counsel for the SLP for which free legal aid is available to the petitioner.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
JULY 1, 2024 / PT
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:47:33
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to 60 days parole/furlough to prepare an SLP for conviction when free legal aid is available and furloughs were previously granted.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Krishan Kumar Malik
State (NCT of Delhi)
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
