Ziya Ur Rehman v. the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
CRL petitioner sought quashing of an FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute. The High Court, noting a post-dispute settlement agreement where the petitioner paid the respondent Rs. 11.5 lakhs, quashed the FIR as continuance of proceedings served no useful purpose.
What did the court decide?
FIR No.146/2013 and proceedings therefrom quashed in view of the settlement between the parties.