This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
JAY PRAKASH AND ANR .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rashid Khan, Advocate with petitioner No. 1 through VC.
versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC, Crl. with Mr. Amit Peswani, Advocate for State. S.I. Shankar, PS Sarita Vihar, Delhi.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 10.09.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2024 at 12:08:46
JAY PRAKASH AND ANR
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
