In a writ petition under Article 226 and Section 528 BNSS, the court disposed of a claim for time-bound investigation direction upon confirmation that the chargesheet was filed and provided petitioner access to its copy.
Petitioner granted access to chargesheet on the day of hearing; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~75
AMBEY KUMARI @ AMBEY MISHRA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Renu, Ms. Samishti Solomon & Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jha, Advocates.
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC, Crl. with Mr. Alok Sharma & Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates for State. S.I. Sanjeev Singh, PS Gazipur, Delhi.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 09.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2024 at 12:08:24
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2024 at 12:08:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a time-bound direction to complete the investigation in the underlying FIR.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ambey Kumari @ Ambey Mishra
State of NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
