Writ petition concerning the marriage of the petitioners. Respondents, including family members, stated no objection and supported the marriage. Petition disposed of as no further directions were necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
SUMIT SHARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through:
versus
STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for State with SI Vijay Kumar, PS: Jaitpur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 16.10.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
OCTOBER 16, 2024/RK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:49:14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the marriage of the petitioners faces any objection from the family members.
SUMIT SHARMA
PETITIONER NO. 2
STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI
RESPONDENT NOS. 4-7
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
