Petitioner sought quashing of FIR under Sections 376/506/509 IPC. Court granted leave to withdraw the petition and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
Through: Mr. Jitender Singh, Mr. Kamla Prasad, Mrs. Meenu Singh & Mr. Siddharth Singh, Advocate (through VC).
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC (criminal) for the State. W/PSI Vandana, PS Madhu Vihar. Mr. Avanish Kumar, Advocate for prosecutrix.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
“a. quash the FIR no. 0091 registered on 19.03.2024 at PS Madhu Vihar, East Delhi Under Section 376/506/509 IPC on the complaint of the respondent no. 2;
b. pass such further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:06:25
AMIT SHARMA, J
JULY 19, 2024/ sn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:06:25
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Krishnanand Dubey
State of NCT of Delhi
Anr
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
