Disposed

Rahis @ Bambaiya v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC9 Jul 2024W.P.(CRL)/1050/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, in custody 16 years, sought modification of parole conditions as no family member would stand surety. Court modified the order to permit release on personal bond of Rs.10,000 with one cash surety, following an earlier similar order.

What did the court decide?

Parole condition modified: release on personal bond Rs.10,000 with one cash surety of like amount to Jail Superintendent's satisfaction.

Rahis @ Bambaiya Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~78

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 1050/2024

¶4

RAHIS @ BAMBAIYA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Rohan J. Alva, Advocate (DHCLSC).

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhinav K Arya, Adv. for the State Insp. Dinesh Chandra PS Khajuri Khas

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶9

O R D E R % 22.08.2024

¶10

CRL.M.A. 25119/2024 ( Exemption )

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Application stands disposed of.

¶13

CRL.M.A. 25118/2024

¶14

This application has been filed seeking modification of order dated 9^th July 2024 granting parole to accused-petitioner for a period of 4 weeks on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount.

¶15

It is stated in the application that after 16 years of custody, petitioner is unable to organise anybody who can stand surety for him, considering his brothers have refused to stand surety for him, and there is no other able

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2024 at 12:36:33

¶18

member in his family.

¶19

Petitioner’s counsel points out to previous order dated 28^th February 2019 where the petitioner had sought a similar modification on parole conditions granted at that stage. Petitioner was then released on parole on furnishing personal bond in sum of Rs10,000/- with one cash surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Superintendent, Tihar Jail.

¶20

In view of the circumstances, the Court deems it fit to modify conditions of bail order dated 9^th July 2024 to the extent that petitioner be released on parole on furnishing personal bond in sum of Rs10,000/- with one cash surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Jail Superintendent. Other conditions shall remain the same.

¶21

Application stands disposed of in above terms.

¶22

Copy of order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for information and compliance.

¶23

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶24

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶25

AUGUST 22, 2024

¶26

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2024 at 12:36:33

Rahis @ Bambaiya v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahis @ Bambaiya v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kholi and Ors. Vs the State and Anr.

Indrakali Verma Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Shreyansh Sharma @ M.K. Shreyans & Ors. Vs State Gnct of Delhi & Anr.

Sanjay Kumar and Anr. Vs State Gnctd and Anr.

Monu Chauhan and Another Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi and Others

Sh.Chetan Bagga Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Others

Mrs Neeraj Verma and Anr. Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) through Secretary and Others

Neeraj Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Babloo Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Amrit Raj @ Amit Raj Vs the State

Raees Ahmed & Ors. Vs State (through SHO Ps Jaitpur) & Anr.

Shyamal Mandal @ Shyamu Vs the State(Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Nitin Kumar Sharma Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)