Disposed

Methrole Sudhakar & Ors. v. Union of India

Delhi HC6 Dec 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1929/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought initiation of contempt proceedings against the Respondent for non-compliance with directions in a dated 07.10.2024 order. Counsel represented that compliance procedures were underway for some petitioners, and pending documents were required for others. Petitioners withdrew the petition in reliance on the assurances given.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition disposed of; liberty granted to revive matter if no communication is received as undertaken.

Methrole Sudhakar & Ors. Vs Union of India — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~97

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1929/2024

¶4

METHROLE SUDHAKAR & ORS.

¶5

.....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala with Mr. Rakchit Mishra, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

UNION OF INDIA

¶9

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohia, SPC with Ms. Saumya Kapoor, GP and with Mr. Simran Khurana, Advocates for UOI.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶12

O R D E R % 06.12.2024

¶13

There are seven petitioners in the present petition.

¶14

They all seek initiation of contempt proceedings against respondents for non-compliance of the directions contained in order dated 07.10.2024 passed by learned Division Bench of this Court passed in W.P.(C) No. 14063/2024

¶15

Learned counsel for respondent appears on advance notice. The concerned officials from the office of the respondent are also present.

¶16

Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, apprises the Court that in relation to petitioner No. 1- Mr. Methrole Sudhakar, petitioner No. 2-Mr. Arun Kumar E, petitioner No. 4-Mr. Nikhil Prakash K P, petitioner No. 5-Mr. Jayasuriya J and petitioner No. 6-Mr. Sandeep K L, the requisite decision has already been taken by the concerned Standing Screening Committee and the matter is under approval and after completion of

¶17

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2024 at 12:54:20

¶19

procedural formalities and receiving the approval, due communication shall be sent to all of them within three weeks from today.

¶20

It is also informed that as far as petitioner Nos. 3- Mr. Chaudhary Vijaykumar Bhemjibhai and 7- Mr. Dinesh Kumar are concerned, the 19^th Standing Screening Committee requires certain documents from them and a communication in this regard was also sent to petitioner No.3-Mr. Chaudhary Vijaykumar Bhemjibhai on 20.11.2024 and petitioner No.7- Mr. Dinesh Kumar on 14.11.2024.

¶21

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in all probabilities, they might have already sent a requisite reply in this regard and if not, he would ensure that they send requisite reply without any further delay.

¶22

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in any case, reply shall be sent within two days from today and learned counsel for the respondent submits that after receiving such documents, the Standing Screening Committee shall consider their cases and send them requisite communication in this regard also, within four weeks from today.

¶23

Such statement is taken on record.

¶24

In view of the above, learned counsel for petitioners submits that he does not press the present contempt petition. He, however, submits that if nothing is communicated, as undertaken above, he may be permitted to revive the present contempt petition.

¶25

The petition stands disposed of, accordingly. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶26

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶27

DECEMBER 6, 2024/ sw

¶28

¶29

Methrole Sudhakar & Ors. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Methrole Sudhakar & Ors. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Kumar Yadav Vs Ashwani Kumar Chairman Ndmc and Tvc & Anr.

Manju Vs Karambir

Aditya Madan Vs Shobhit Madan and Ors.

Dilli Atithi Shikshak Sangh Vs Sh Himanshu Gupta IAS Director of Education

Andhra Pradesh Basketball Association & Ors. Vs Chander Mukhi Sharma & Anr.

Ishtiyak Hussain Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Om Prakash & Ors. Vs Rajiv Chaudhary General Manager , North Railway & Ors.

Abhimanyu Garg Vs Gaurang Shetty & Ors.

Abhishek Monga Vs Delhi Develoment Authority

Deepak Saini Vs Canara Bank & Anr.

Abida Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Tej Kishen & Ors. Vs UOI & Ors.

Suresh Chander Gupta Vs Sh. Govind Mohan

Sumit Sheoran & Ors. Vs Union of India