A review petition and application seeking condonation of delay were filed regarding directions to hold a disciplinary inquiry. The court found no apparent error, no sufficient cause for delay, and dismissed both applications.
Both the review petition and the application for condonation of delay were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
PAWAN KUMAR TANEJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nazim Uddin Ahmed, Mr. Utkarsh Bhatt, Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav, Mr. Aditya Shankar & Mr. Dipak, Advs.
versus
KARUR VYASA BANK LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R % 09.05.2025
REVIEW PET. 234/2025– FRESH BY R-1 FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DT.03.12.2024
CM APPL. 20247/2025 – FRESH BY R-1 FOR DELAY OF 84 DAYS IN FILING THE REVIEW PETITION
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
MAY 09, 2025 /sp/ss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:18:21
PAWAN KUMAR TANEJA
KARUR VYASA BANK LTD
DHARMESH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
